A Volunteer Crossover Feasibility Study to Compare Standard Oxygen Cannula Used at High-Flow to Proprietary High-Flow Humidified Nasal Oxygen Systems

  • Johnson M
  • Devine G
  • Marshall R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and aim: Supplemental oxygen is routinely administered to patients prior to and during induction of general anesthesia and sedation. This increases the fraction of oxygen in the lungs, increases oxygen delivery, and increases the time to oxygen desaturation. Proprietary Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) systems, which deliver warmed and humidified oxygen, have been extensively researched in the perioperative and critical care setting and have been shown to significantly prolong time to desaturation and as a means of ventilatory support. The use of traditional nasal oxygen cannula used at maximum flow rates is currently used in short bursts as it is poorly tolerated. There is however a dearth of data examining the use of this technique. We hypothesized that traditional nasal oxygen cannulae used at maximum flow rates can deliver oxygen as effectively as THRIVE in this setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, M. Z., Devine, G., & Marshall, R. (2023). A Volunteer Crossover Feasibility Study to Compare Standard Oxygen Cannula Used at High-Flow to Proprietary High-Flow Humidified Nasal Oxygen Systems. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free