Crises conducting stakeholder salience: shifts in the evolution of private universities’ governance in Latin America

28Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to build on embedded approaches to stakeholder management and examines how organizational decision-makers consider social responsibility toward proximal stakeholders in crises that encompass an entire system of stakeholder relationships. Design/methodology/approach: Within a criterion-based sample of eight Latin American private universities, this paper develops in-depth exploratory case studies to examine the prioritization of stakeholders in higher education institutions’ decision-making during the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis. Findings: Contrary to the notion that during crises organizations prioritize stakeholders that provide resources that are critical to survival, this study finds that in contextual crises stakeholder management is informed by social responsibility. In addition, the findings suggest that crises may be tipping points for changes toward mission-driven approaches to governance. Practical implications: Acknowledging the roles of social responsibility and proximity in stakeholder management during contextual crises allows for more informed governance of organizations that face disruptions in their system of stakeholder relations. Originality/value: This study contributes unique insights into the decision-maker’s prioritization of stakeholders during the COVID-19 crisis. The uncertainty associated with the emerging “new normal” allowed for an extreme test of socially embedded versus resource-oriented approaches to stakeholder management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., Cordova, M., Hermans, M., Nava-Aguirre, K. M., Monje-Cueto, F., Mingo, S., … Floriani, D. E. (2021). Crises conducting stakeholder salience: shifts in the evolution of private universities’ governance in Latin America. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(6), 1194–1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2020-0397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free