Updated discussions on ‘Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues’

28Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A recent review discussed a variety of hybrid multiple criteria decision-making (H.M.C.D.M.) methods on the subject of sustainability issues. Some soft computing techniques, such as the fuzzy set, have contributed significantly to H.M.C.D.M. studies, emulating the imprecise or uncertain judgments of experts/decision makers in a complex environment. Nevertheless, a new rising trend in H.M.C.D.M., known as multiple rule-based decision-making (M.R.D.M.), which has the advantage of revealing understandable knowledge for supporting systematic improvements based on influential network relation maps (I.N.R.M.), was not discussed in the review. This study therefore attempts to extend the review by introducing recent developments and the associated work on M.R.D.M. for solving practical problems, updating the discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, K. Y., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2018, January 1). Updated discussions on ‘Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues.’ Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja . Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1483836

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free