Determination of Nitrofurazone in topical pharmaceutical preparations: Comparison of the UV-visible diffuse reflectance versus transmittance versus HPLC methods

25Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

HLPC has been an important technique in the analysis of pharmaceutical principles in pharmaceutical preparations. Sometimes, however, the use of this technique presumed to be more rapid, simple and reliable, is not the most adequate. In various cases simpler and more rapid methods can be used with clear advantages. In the present work the comparison of the quantitative results obtained with the HPLC recommended method with those resulted from the UV-Visible diffuse reflectance determination procedure and with the classical transmittance measurements of aqueous solutions was done. The experimental results of the three methods were compared through the statistical Student's t test and agreement was observed at 95% confidence level. Among them the diffuse UV-Visible reflectance procedure is the simplest and the transmittance method offered the highest precision. The accuracy of the three methods is similar. A very interesting characteristic of the proposed reflectance method is that, despite the fact that it is quantitative, no weighing of aliquots is needed. © 2009 Sociedade Brasileira de Química.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tubino, M., Vila, M. M. D. C., & Palumbo, M. N. (2009). Determination of Nitrofurazone in topical pharmaceutical preparations: Comparison of the UV-visible diffuse reflectance versus transmittance versus HPLC methods. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 20(10), 1901–1907. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532009001000019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free