Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Rationale, technique, results

20Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) makes it difficult to resect adequate vaginal cuff according to tumor size and to avoid tumor spread after opening the vagina. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) is associated with higher risk for urologic complications. Methods: The vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) technique comprises 3 steps: (1) comprehensive laparoscopic staging, (2) creation of a tumoradapted vaginal cuff, and (3) laparoscopic transsection of parametria. We retrospectively analyzed data of 122 patients who underwent VALRH for early stage cervical cancer (n=110) or stage II endometrial cancer (n=12) between January 2007 and December 2009 at Charité University Berlin. Results: All patients underwent VALRH without conversion. Mean operating time was 300 minutes, and mean blood loss was 123cc. On average, 36 lymph nodes were harvested. Intra- and postoperative complication rates were 0% and 13.1%, respectively. Resection was in sound margins in all patients. After median follow-up of 19 months, disease-free survival and overall survival for all 110 cervical cancer patients was 94% and 98%, and for the subgroup of patients (n=90) with tumors ≤pT1b1 N0 V0 L0/1 R0, 97% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: VALRH is a valid alternative to abdominal radical hysterectomy and LARVH in patients with earlystage cervical cancer and endometrial cancer stage II with minimal intraoperative complications and identical oncologic outcomes. © 2011 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gottschalk, E., Lanowska, M., Chiantera, V., Marnitz Dr., S., Schneider Dr., A., Brink-Spalink Dr., V., … Koehler Dr., C. (2011). Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Rationale, technique, results. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 15(4), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203879

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free