Effect of simulating tooth brushing on surface change of different ceramic materials

  • Haggag K
  • Abbas M
  • Ramadan H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Purpose of the present study was to evaluate the surface roughness of current ceramics before and after tooth brushing abrasion, using simulated tooth brushing wear testing. Materials and Methods: 40 ceramic samples (Zirconia ceramics, Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, & E-max ceramics) were cut from corresponding 4 types of ceramic blocks using microtome, then 40 samples were divided into 4 groups (n=10). Each sample has a fixed dimension about 10 x 10 x 2mm (thickness). The 3-body simulated tooth brushing wear testing was performed using a programmable logic controlled equipment; ROBOTA chewing simulator* integrated with thermo-cyclic protocol, then Surface roughness of each material (Ra) was measured with USB digital surface profile gauge. Results: Total effect of material; regardless to toothbrush wear simulation cycles, totally there was no-significant (p=0.1379 > 0.05) difference between all materials where (Zr ≥ e.max ≥V enamic ≥ L ultimate) with their mean values respectively after 24 months (Zr; 0.25898 ±0.0035, e.max; 0.25428 ±0.0029, V enamic; 0.25413 ±0.0049, L ultimate; 0.25403 ±0.0028). Total effect of toothbrush wear simulation cycles; irrespective of material, totally toothbrush wear simulation cycles did not affect roughness significantly (p=0.8281 > 0.05) difference between all materials where (18 m ≥ baseline ≥ 6 m ≥24 m ≥ 12 m). Conclusions: Brushing of ceramic materials with conventional dentifrices non-significantly increased surface roughness, where results of surface roughness present within the clinically acceptable range, not insult the patient intraorally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haggag, K., Abbas, M., Ramadan, H., & Fawzy, M. (2018). Effect of simulating tooth brushing on surface change of different ceramic materials. Egyptian Dental Journal, 64(1), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.78077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free