Abstract
The transit technique is responsible for the majority of exoplanet discoveries to date. Characterizing these planets involves careful modeling of their transit profiles. A common technique involves expressing the transit duration using a density-like parameter, ρ ˜ , often called the “circular density.” Most notably, the Kepler project—the largest analysis of transit light curves to date—adopted a linear prior on ρ ˜ . Here, we show that such a prior biases measurements of impact parameter, b , due to the nonlinear relationship between ρ ˜ and transit duration. This bias slightly favors low values ( b ≲ 0.3) and strongly disfavors high values ( b ≳ 0.7) unless the transit signal-to-noise ratio is sufficient to provide an independent constraint on b , a criterion that is not satisfied for the majority of Kepler planets. Planet-to-star radius ratio, r , is also biased due to r − b covariance. Consequently, the median Kepler DR25 target suffers a 1.6% systematic underestimate of r . We present a techniques for correcting these biases and for avoiding them in the first place.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gilbert, G. J., MacDougall, M. G., & Petigura, E. A. (2022). Implicit Biases in Transit Models Using Stellar Pseudo Density. The Astronomical Journal, 164(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac7f2f
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.