Evaluation of Traditional and Data-Driven Algorithms for Energy Disaggregation Under Sampling and Filtering Conditions

Abstract

Non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) enables the disaggregation of appliance-level energy consumption from aggregate electrical signals, offering a scalable solution for improving efficiency. This study compared the performance of traditional NILM algorithms (Mean, CO, Hart85, FHMM) and deep neural network-based approaches (DAE, RNN, Seq2Point, Seq2Seq, WindowGRU) under various experimental conditions. Factors such as sampling rate, harmonic content, and the application of power filters were analyzed. A key aspect of the evaluation was the difference in testing conditions: while traditional algorithms were evaluated under multiple experimental configurations, deep learning models, due to their extremely high computational cost, were analyzed exclusively under a specific configuration consisting of a 1-s sampling rate, with harmonic content present and without applying power filters. The results confirm that no universally superior algorithm exists, and performance varies depending on the type of appliance and signal conditions. Traditional algorithms are faster and more computationally efficient, making them more suitable for scenarios with limited resources or rapid response requirements. However, significantly more computationally expensive deep learning models showed higher average accuracy (MAE, RMSE, NDE) and event detection capability (F1-SCORE) in the specific configuration in which they were evaluated. These models excel in detailed signal reconstruction and handling harmonics without requiring filtering in this configuration. The selection of the optimal NILM algorithm for real-world applications must consider a balance between desired accuracy, load types, electrical signal characteristics, and crucially, the limitations of available computational resources.