Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: Is the CAEP Position Statement too negative?

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is clear that no consensus exists regarding the appropriateness of tPA for acute ischemic stroke. The CAEP committee's willingness to acknowledge this, to recognize the limitations of the therapy, and to recommend appropriate caution, is a tremendously positive step. It should be applauded heartily by all of us who do our best to make difficult decisions, under enormous time stresses – regardless of whether we suspect that tPA will ultimately prove, on balance, and in community practice, to do more good, or more harm, in patients with suspected stroke. © 2001, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoffman, J. R. (2001). Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: Is the CAEP Position Statement too negative? Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500005510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free