Cognitive reserve in individuals with frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

As the literature related to cognitive reserve (CR) in individuals with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is only emerging, a clear consensus on the relationship among CR proxies, brain status, and clinical performance has not been reached. The primary aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship among sociobehavioral proxies of CR, brain status, and clinical performance in individuals with various types of FTD. Additionally, characteristics of patient population, sociobehavioral proxies, disease severity tools, and brain status measures used were identified. The systematic review was conducted using comprehensive search terms in Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were for studies to include at least one CR and one brain status measure for individuals with FTD, be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and be published in English. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess study quality and bias risk. A total of 237 titles and abstracts were screened, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Together, these studies report 1,423 participants with FTD. Based on the included studies, partial support was demonstrated for CR in individuals with FTD when education, occupation, and leisure were utilized as CR proxies. The variability in results among studies could be related to the different tools used to measure CR, brain status, and disease severity. This review provides recommendations for future studies: incorporating longitudinal designs, in depth neuropsychological testing, consistent disease duration measure, and transparant statistical output reporting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grebe, L. A., Vonk, J. M. J., Galletta, E. E., & Goral, M. (2024). Cognitive reserve in individuals with frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2410207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free