Effects of long-acting loop diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: A crossover study

5Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There have been no reports evaluating the impact of long-acting loop diuretics (LLD) on the outcome of heart failure (HF) and arrhythmia treatment in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized crossover study. We allocated 21 consecutive CRT implanted patients into 2 groups. The furosemide group received furosemide as a first treatment and azosemide as a second treatment. The azosemide group received this treatment in the reverse order. The first treatment was given to each group for 6 months and the second treatment continued for an additional 6 months. We combined the data of each medication regimen in each group and analyzed it at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary endpoints were the variation of fluid index and thoracic impedance measured by CRT at 6 months. The baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. The difference in the primary endpoints was not statistically significant between the 2 medication arms (fluid index: -29.6 ± 64.4 versus 16.2 ± 48.2; P = 0.22, thoracic impedance: -0.49 ± 17.8 versus 2.45 ± 12.5; P = 0.56). Likewise, the clinical outcome of HF and the CRT derived parameters in both arms were comparable. HFrEF patients taking LLD after CRT implantation might be comparable to those taking short-acting loop diuretics in the treatment of HF and HF-associated arrhythmias. (Int Heart J 2017; 58: 211-219)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asami, M., Aoki, J., Tanimoto, S., Horiuchi, Y., Watanabe, M., Furui, K., … Hara, K. (2017). Effects of long-acting loop diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: A crossover study. International Heart Journal, 58(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.16-290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free