Contact Index–Guided Pulsed Field Ablation: A Two-Phase Validation of the Impedance Change Threshold to Prevent Acute Pulmonary Vein Gaps

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires adequate catheter–tissue contact. The Contact Index visualizes impedance change for the pentaspline catheter, but a validated contact threshold is unknown. Objective: The objective of this study is to define an impedance-change cutoff that predicts sufficient contact to prevent acute pulmonary vein gaps (PVG) during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and to validate Contact–Index-guided PVI. Methods: A prospective, single-center, two-phase study was performed. Phase 1 (n = 10) measured impedance change (%) at eight antral segments per vein immediately before PFA in basket and flower configurations; the larger per-segment value was analyzed. Post-PVI high-density voltage mapping (PVG ≥ 0.5 mV) was the reference; a receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the cutoff. Phase 2 (n = 26) delivered energy only when all target splines met/exceeded the cutoff value obtained from Phase 1. Results: In Phase 1, PVG occurred in 13/320 segments across 2/10 patients (4/40 veins). Impedance change was lower at PVG-positive than PVG-negative segments (median 2 [0–6.5]% vs. 24 [17–32]%, p < 0.001). The cutoff value obtained from Phase 1 was ≥ 10% (area under the curve 0.99; sensitivity 100%; specificity 92.1%). In Phase 2, enforcing ≥ 10% yielded no patient-level PVG (0/26 vs. 2/10; p = 0.07) and fewer gaps per vein (0/104 vs. 4/40; p = 0.005) and per segment (0/832 vs. 13/320; p < 0.001) compared with Phase 1. Procedure time, PVI time, fluoroscopy time, and total applications were similar between phases. Conclusions: An impedance-change threshold of ≥ 10% on the Contact Index reliably indicates adequate contact with the pentaspline catheter and, when enforced, reduces acute PVG without prolonging procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, R., Nagashima, K., Masuda, H., Matsushima, A., Hirata, S., Saito, Y., … Okumura, Y. (2026). Contact Index–Guided Pulsed Field Ablation: A Two-Phase Validation of the Impedance Change Threshold to Prevent Acute Pulmonary Vein Gaps. Journal of Arrhythmia, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70333

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free