Maxillary constriction: Are there differences between anterior and posterior regions?

9Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the transverse constriction of the maxilla in both anterior and posterior regions, using Korkhaus analysis and to check whether there were any statistically significant differences within its values. Method: The sample comprised 341 study models. The study models were randomly selected from previous cases, without gender, age and malocclusion restrictions. The models were submitted to Korkhaus analysis. Data from these models were subjected to statistical analyzes in order to evaluate differences in anterior and posterior regions. Results: The transverse discrepancies were statistically significant (p<0.001) with a greater constriction in the anterior region (mean -2.84 mm). Conclusion: The results showed that the differential diagnosis is very important and the treatment plan may be adapted to specific therapy focusing in a greater expansion in the anterior region. © 2012 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belluzzo, R. H. L., Junior, K. F., Lascala, C. E., & Vianna, L. B. R. (2012). Maxillary constriction: Are there differences between anterior and posterior regions? Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512012000400009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free