Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review

23Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The remarkable recent advances in managing keratoconus, the most common corneal ectasia, encouraged researchers to conduct further studies on the disease. Despite the abundance of information about keratoconus, debates persist regarding the detection of mild cases. Early detection plays a crucial role in facilitating less invasive treatments. This review encompasses corneal data ranging from the basic sciences to the application of artificial intelligence in keratoconus patients. Diagnostic systems utilize automated decision trees, support vector machines, and various types of neural networks, incorporating input from various corneal imaging equipment. Although the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into corneal imaging devices may take time, their popularity in clinical practice is increasing. Most of the studies reviewed herein demonstrate a high discriminatory power between normal and keratoconus cases, with a relatively lower discriminatory power for subclinical keratoconus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Niazi, S., Jiménez-García, M., Findl, O., Gatzioufas, Z., Doroodgar, F., Shahriari, M. H., & Javadi, M. A. (2023, August 1). Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review. Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162715

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free