Defining the vital condition for organ donation

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The issue of organ donation and of how the donor pool can or should be increased is one with significant practical, ethical and logistic implications. Here we comment on an article advocating a paradigm change in the so-called "dead donor rule". Such change would involve the societal and legal abandonment of the above rule and the introduction of mandated choice. In this commentary, we review some of the problems associated with the proposed changes as well as the problems associated with the current model. We emphasize the continuing problems with the definition of death and the physiological process of dying; we discuss the difficulties associated with a dichotomous view of death; we review the difficulties with non-beating heart donation and emphasize the current limitations of society's understanding of these complex issues. We conclude that public education remains the best approach and that such education should not be merely promotion of a particular ideology but honest debate of what is socially and morally acceptable and appropriate given the changes in vital organ support technology and the need to respect patient autonomy. © 2007 Bellomo and Zamperetti; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellomo, R., & Zamperetti, N. (2007, November 19). Defining the vital condition for organ donation. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-2-27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free