Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease

  • De Bruyne B
  • Pijls N
  • Kalesan B
  • et al.
2.5kCitations
Citations of this article
1.3kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The preferred initial treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease is the best available medical therapy. We hypothesized that in patients with functionally significant stenoses, as determined by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus the best available medical therapy would be superior to the best available medical therapy alone. Methods In patients with stable coronary artery disease for whom PCI was being considered, we assessed all stenoses by measuring FFR. Patients in whom at least one stenosis was functionally significant (FFR, ≤0.80) were randomly assigned to FFR-guided PCI plus the best available medical therapy (PCI group) or the best available medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 were entered into a registry and received the best available medical therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularizat...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Bruyne, B., Pijls, N. H. J., Kalesan, B., Barbato, E., Tonino, P. A. L., Piroth, Z., … Fearon, W. F. (2012). Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(11), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1205361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free