KLSBench: Evaluating LLM Capabilities on Korean Literary Sinitic Texts in Historical Context

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Featured Application: KLSBench provides essential evaluation protocols for deploying LLM-powered applications on digitized Korean Literary Sinitic archives. This benchmark enables systematic assessment of automated annotation systems, intelligent search interfaces, and educational platforms for digital humanities projects, supporting historians, philologists, and students in accessing and analyzing historical text collections. Large language models (LLMs) show limited capability in processing low-resource historical languages due to insufficient training data and domain-specific linguistic structures. Korean Literary Sinitic (KLS), the principal written medium of the Joseon dynasty, remains particularly under-resourced despite its lexical overlap with modern Korean and shared script with classical Chinese. To enable systematic evaluation in this domain, we introduce KLSBench, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing LLM performance on KLS. KLSBench contains 7871 instances sourced from Joseon dynasty civil service examination archives and parallel corpora of the Four Books, and encompasses five task categories: classification, retrieval, punctuation restoration, natural language inference, and translation. Our evaluation suggests KLSBench could work as an effective diagnostic tool that distinguishes lexical recall from deeper linguistic comprehension in low-resource historical languages. Beyond establishing evaluation baselines, KLSBench provides practical frameworks for deploying LLM-based tools in digital humanities contexts, including automated annotation systems and intelligent search interfaces for classical text repositories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, S. H., Yang, W. S., Ma, X., & Chung, T. S. (2026). KLSBench: Evaluating LLM Capabilities on Korean Literary Sinitic Texts in Historical Context. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free