SCUBA-2 Ultra Deep Imaging EAO Survey (STUDIES): Faint-end Counts at 450 μm

  • Wang W
  • Lin W
  • Lim C
  • et al.
51Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The SCUBA-2 Ultra Deep Imaging EAO Survey (STUDIES) is a three-year JCMT Large Program aiming to reach the 450 μ m confusion limit in the COSMOS-CANDELS region to study a representative sample of the high-redshift far-infrared galaxy population that gives rise to the bulk of the far-infrared background. We present the first-year data from STUDIES. We reached a 450 μ m noise level of 0.91 mJy for point sources at the map center, covered an area of 151 arcmin 2 , and detected 98 and 141 sources at 4.0 σ and 3.5 σ , respectively. Our derived counts are best constrained in the 3.5–25 mJy regime using directly detected sources. Below the detection limits, our fluctuation analysis further constrains the slope of the counts down to 1 mJy. The resulting counts at 1–25 mJy are consistent with a power law having a slope of −2.59 (±0.10 for 3.5–25 mJy, and − 0.7 + 0.4 for 1–3.5 mJy). There is no evidence of a faint-end termination or turnover of the counts in this flux density range. Our counts are also consistent with previous SCUBA-2 blank-field and lensing-cluster surveys. The integrated surface brightness from our counts down to 1 mJy is 90.0 ± 17.2 Jy deg −2 , which can account for up to 83 − 16 + 15 % of the COBE  450 μ m background. We show that Herschel counts at 350 and 500 μ m are significantly higher than our 450 μ m counts, likely caused by its large beam and source clustering. High angular resolution instruments like SCUBA-2 at 450 μ m are therefore highly beneficial for measuring the luminosity and spatial density of high-redshift dusty galaxies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, W.-H., Lin, W.-C., Lim, C.-F., Smail, I., Chapman, S. C., Zheng, X. Z., … Wardlow, J. L. (2017). SCUBA-2 Ultra Deep Imaging EAO Survey (STUDIES): Faint-end Counts at 450 μm. The Astrophysical Journal, 850(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa911b

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free