Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces

84Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When a dye solution used to simulate patient material was either injected into high-speed dental handpiece (drill) waterlines or applied to the equipment externally, internal air turbine chambers became contaminated. These chambers served as a reservoir of the material, which was slowly dislodged by air expelled during subsequent handpiece operation and which was diluted by water spray used for cooling the drilling surface. Considering the fact that patient materials could reside in internal parts of the equipment that are not usually disinfected and that the material may be subsequently sprayed into cuts and abrasions in the oral cavity, the common approach to reprocessing handpieces (external wiping in combination with flushing) may pose unacceptably high risks to those individuals treated soon after infected patients. Therefore, unless reliable data on cross-infection frequencies are obtained and prove it unnecessary, heat-treating high-speed handpieces between each patient should be considered an essential component of standard procedures whenever universal precautions are practiced in dentistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, D. L., & Boe, R. K. (1992). Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 30(2), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.2.401-406.1992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free