1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy

  • Vaisman A
  • Chambers H
  • Winston L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a highly lethal infection; frst-line therapy with a β-lactam, commonly cefazolin, provides a signifcant mortality beneft over the second-line therapy, vancomycin, which is often used in patients reporting β-lactam allergy. Methods. We designed a simulation model of inpatients aged 55-75 years with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported history of β-lactam allergy. The model adopted a US health-system perspective, a lifetime horizon, and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). We compared routine care (vanco-mycin), history screening (questionnaire assessing anaphylaxis history), and bedside penicillin skin testing. Incremental cost-efectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured using 2017 US dollars per QALY. Baseline co-morbid states (diabetes, malignancy, and endstage renal disease [ESRD] requiring dialysis) were also modeled. Future costs and benefts were discounted at 3% per year. Results. Among patients with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported penicillin allergy, skin testing produced the best clinical outcomes and was cost-efective relative to history screening, generating 0.51 additional QALYs at an ICER of $22,062 per QALY gained. Among patients with diabetes, malignancy, or ESRD, the ICER for skin testing relative to history screening increased to $30,830-$127,182, refecting the overall lower life expectancy and high annual survivor healthcare cost in these higher risk groups. Results were robust to wide variations in the cost and diagnostic performance of skin testing: in sensitivity analyses, skin testing remained the optimal strategy when cost was 60%, and sensitivity >10%. Conclusion. Among adults with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported β-lactam allergy, skin testing is cost-efective relative to history screening and routine care at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds and should be widely adopted given the mortality beneft of β-lactams over alternate antibiotics in MSSA bacteremia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaisman, A., Chambers, H. F., Winston, L. G., & Kazi, D. (2018). 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(suppl_1), S506–S507. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free