Comparison of the antitussive effect of remifentanil during recovery from propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia

19Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This prospective randomised study compared the antitussive effect of remifentanil during recovery from either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Seventy-four female patients undergoing thyroidectomy were anaesthetised with either propofol and remifentanil or sevoflurane and remifentanil. During recovery, remifentanil was maintained at an effectsite concentration of 2 ng.ml -1 until extubation and the occurrence of coughing, haemodynamic parameters and recovery profiles were compared between the two groups. During recovery, neither the incidence nor the severity of cough (incidence 20% with propofol; 24% with sevoflurane, p = 0.77), nor the haemodynamic parameters were different between the two groups. Time to awakening and time to extubation were significantly shorter in the propofol group (4.7 min, 6.1 min min, respectively) compared with the sevoflurane group (7.9 min and 8.9 min respectively) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). An effect-site concentration of 2 ng.ml -1 of remifentanil was associated with smooth emergence from both propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., Choi, S. H., Choi, Y. S., Lee, J. H., Kim, N. O., & Lee, J. R. (2012). Comparison of the antitussive effect of remifentanil during recovery from propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 67(7), 765–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07136.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free