Considerations for the use of imaging tools for phase II treatment trials in oncology

49Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the context of assessing tumor response, imaging tools have the potential to play a vital role in phase II and III treatment trials. If the imaging test is able to predict potential phase III success in a reliable fashion, it would be a useful tool in phase II trial design as it may provide for a more rapid and timely response assessment. The benefits and challenges of using anatomic imaging measures as well as the promising molecular imaging measures, primarily fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography, are discussed here. The general issues related to successful implementation of advanced imaging in the context of phase II treatment trials are discussed. © 2009 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shankar, L. K., Van Den Abbeele, A., Yap, J., Benjamin, R., Scheutze, S., & FitzGerald, T. J. (2009). Considerations for the use of imaging tools for phase II treatment trials in oncology. Clinical Cancer Research, 15(6), 1891–1897. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free