Abstract
In the context of assessing tumor response, imaging tools have the potential to play a vital role in phase II and III treatment trials. If the imaging test is able to predict potential phase III success in a reliable fashion, it would be a useful tool in phase II trial design as it may provide for a more rapid and timely response assessment. The benefits and challenges of using anatomic imaging measures as well as the promising molecular imaging measures, primarily fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography, are discussed here. The general issues related to successful implementation of advanced imaging in the context of phase II treatment trials are discussed. © 2009 American Association for Cancer Research.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shankar, L. K., Van Den Abbeele, A., Yap, J., Benjamin, R., Scheutze, S., & FitzGerald, T. J. (2009). Considerations for the use of imaging tools for phase II treatment trials in oncology. Clinical Cancer Research, 15(6), 1891–1897. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2030
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.