Cast vs external fixation: A comparative study in elderly osteoporotic distal radial fracture patients

28Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: This study compared fracture treatment with plaster cast vs external fixation. Methods: Forty elderly female osteoporotic wrist fracture patients were randomized to be treated with either plaster cast (Group A) or external fixation (Group B). Bone mineral density less than -2.5 T-score was among the inclusion criteria. Results: In Group A, four redisplacements occurred, whereas in Group B there were none (p = 0.005). Horesh score was higher in Group B (p < 0.006) than in Group A. Volar angle deformity (p < 0.0005) and radial angle deformity (p = 0.008) were lower in Group B. Conclusions: This study shows that external fixation improves stability in elderly osteoporotic wrist fracture patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moroni, A., Vannini, F., Faldini, C., Pegreffi, F., & Giannini, S. (2004). Cast vs external fixation: A comparative study in elderly osteoporotic distal radial fracture patients. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 93(1), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690409300114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free