Two perspectives of the appropriate use criteria in cardiology practice: Advantageous and useful or limiting and harmful?

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The appropriate use criteria (AUC) has become an integral part of the cardiologist's daily practice and have evolved greatly since their inception over a decade ago. However, as health care costs continue to rise, the AUC has come to play an even more pivotal role in the way medicine-specifically cardiology-is practiced today. This editorial describes two opposing viewpoints commonly held by practicing clinicians of the AUC. Written from the perspective of two fellows-in-training looking ahead at the challenges and opportunities of clinical practice (under the auspices of several experienced clinicians and leaders of the American College of Cardiology), this article provides a fresh perspective on the impact AUC has on our patients, clinicians, and the health care system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krishnan, S. K., Bahia, A., Brindis, R. G., Lepor, N. E., Itchhaporia, D., & Patel, P. M. (2017). Two perspectives of the appropriate use criteria in cardiology practice: Advantageous and useful or limiting and harmful? Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. MedReviews LLC. https://doi.org/10.3909/ricm0884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free