Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in glottic cancer

25Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression has been associated with a poor prognosis in many cancers. However, the role of COX-2 overexpression in head and neck cancers remains undetermined. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether COX-2 is a prognostic factor in glottic cancer. Experimental Design: This study was part of a phase III placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of α-tocopherol in reducing second primary cancers (SPC) in head and neck cancer patients. Immunohistochemical analyses were conducted on pretreatment biopsies of 301 patients with early-stage glottic cancer treated by radiotherapy. The median value of 50% of positive tumor cells was the cutoff point used to define COX-2 overexpression. Outcomes considered in the statistical analysis were recurrence, SPC, and death. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: The HR associated with COX-2 overexpression was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.55-1.62) for recurrence. The HR associated with SPC was 2.63( 95% CI, 1.32-5.23) for the first 3.5 years of follow-up and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.22-1.32) for the following 3.5 years. The HR associated with COX-2 overexpression was 1.57 (95% CI,1.01-2.45) for overall mortality. Conclusions: COX-2 overexpression in glottic cancer was associated with increased overall mortality and an increased risk of SPC during the early follow-up period. Future studies are needed to explain observed effects on SPC. COX-2 expression may prove helpful in defining an individual patient's prognosis. © 2008 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sackett, M. K., Bairati, I., Meyer, F., Jobin, É., Lussier, S., Fortin, A., … Têtu, B. (2008). Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in glottic cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 14(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free