Sedative, analgesic, and cardiovascular effects of levomedetomidine alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine in dogs

70Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To determine whether a high dose of levomedetomidine had any pharmacologic activity or would antagonize the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine in dogs. Animals - 6 healthy Beagles. Procedure - Each dog received the following treatments on separate days: a Iow dose of levomedetomidine (10 μg/kg), IV, as a bolus, followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 25 μg/kg/h; a high dose of levomedetomidine (80 μg/kg), IV, as a bolus, followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 200 μg/kg/h; and a dose of isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, IV, as a bolus, followed by continuous infusion (control). For all 3 treatments, the infusion was continued for 120 minutes. After 60 minutes, a single dose of dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg) was administered IV. Sedation and analgesia were scored subjectively, and heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, arterial blood gas partial pressures, and rectal temperatures were monitored. Results - Administration of levomedetomidine did not cause any behavioral changes. However, administration of the higher dose of levomedetomidine enhanced the bradycardia and reduced the sedative and analgesic effects associated with administration of dexmedetomidine. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Results suggest that administration of dexmedetomidine alone may have some cardiovascular benefits over administration of medetomidine, which contains both dexmedetomidine and levomedetomidine. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical importance of the effects of levomedetomidine in dogs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuusela, E., Vainio, O., Kaistinen, A., Kobylin, S., & Raekallio, M. (2001). Sedative, analgesic, and cardiovascular effects of levomedetomidine alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 62(4), 616–621. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free