Rape Myths, Rape Law and Mendelsohn’s Victimology: Law’s ‘Bio-psycho-social’ Witness

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article provides a feminist reading of a neglected text: victimology founder Benjamin Mendelsohn’s essay about rape victims and the law, ‘Rape in Criminology and the Importance of the Female Judge’ (Mendelsohn Benjamin in La Giustizia Penale I-II-III-IV:28–50 1940). Following the heuristics of feminist socio-legal scholarship, my reading unsettles the established origin story of victimology and furthers feminist knowledge about the persistence of rape myths. I show victimology sprang from Mendelsohn’s work as a rape trial lawyer and was a vehicle for modernising rape myths, brought into being in response to rape survivor-corroborating advancements in forensic science. Mendelsohn’s ‘bio-psycho-social’ method of criminal defence sought a modern scientific foundation for rape myths, mobilising biological, psychoanalytic and sociological knowledge to contrive new grounds for invalidating complainant testimony as corrupt data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stringer, R. (2025). Rape Myths, Rape Law and Mendelsohn’s Victimology: Law’s ‘Bio-psycho-social’ Witness. Feminist Legal Studies, 33(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-024-09548-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free