A Reply to Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I respond to symposium articles by Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden. With shared sympathies for anti-oppression liberalism and social contract theory, they urge me to develop the theory of liberal dependency care (LDC) in new directions - respectively, as a form of subject-centered justice, with a political liberal justification, and with a Kantian foundation for 'private right.' I respond by explicating the inclusivity that is built into the arrow of care map and the variety of contract theory I advance. Furthermore, I insist that anti-oppression liberalism need not formulate its claims in political liberal terms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhandary, A. L. (2023). A Reply to Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden. Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review, 62(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221732200035X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free