Influence of postprocessing rinsing solutions and duration on flexural strength of aged and nonaged additively manufactured interim dental material

28Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Statement of problem: Additive manufacturing procedures for fabricating interim restorations include rinsing postprocessing procedures. However, the impact of different rinsing solutions and times on flexural strength is unknown. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of the rinsing solutions and duration, as well as accelerated aging (thermocycling) procedures, on the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of an additively manufactured interim dental material. Material and methods: A bar design (25×2×2 mm) file was used to fabricate all the specimens with 3D printing and an interim material (Nextdent C&B MFH). Five groups were created based on the rinsing solution used during the postprocessing procedures: 91% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (control or IPA-91), 99% IPA (IPA-99 group), bio-ethyl alcohol 100% (BE group), tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (TPM) 100% (TPM group), and water miscible formula (Resinaway) (RA group). Each group was divided into 4 subgroups depending on the total rinsing time: 5, 6, 7, and 8 minutes (5, 6, 7, and 8 subgroups). Additionally, each subgroup was distributed between nonaged and aged thermocycling procedures (n=10). Flexural strength measurements were made by using a universal testing machine. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values, including the Weibull modulus, scale (m), and shape (0), were calculated. Three-way ANOVA and pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05). Results: Three-way ANOVA showed that the rinsing solution (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scherer, M. D., Al-Haj Husain, N., Barmak, A. B., Kois, J. C., Özcan, M., & Revilla-León, M. (2024). Influence of postprocessing rinsing solutions and duration on flexural strength of aged and nonaged additively manufactured interim dental material. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 131(5), 959–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free