Abstract
Purpose of Review: Suicide risk assessment is a challenge in clinical practice. Implicit measures may present with advantages with respect to explicit methods, and therefore may be useful for the assessment of suicide risk. We conducted a systematic review of 2 databases (PubMed and EMBASE) about implicit tests that measure suicide risk to explore their validity and reliability. Recent Findings: Initial research revealed 321 articles. After the selection process, 31 articles were included in the review. The most death-related implicit cognition test used was the Death/Suicide Implicit association test (D/S IAT), followed by the Suicide Stroop Task. The Suicide Affect Misattribution Procedure (S-AMP) and the Death version of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (D-IRAP) were also used. Summary: We found that the measures reviewed were generally valid for the assessment of past and future suicidal thoughts and behaviors, with statistically significant results regarding retrospective and prospective associations.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Moreno, M., Gutiérrez-Rojas, L., & Porras-Segovia, A. (2022, February 1). Implicit Cognition Tests for the Assessment of Suicide Risk: a Systematic Review. Current Psychiatry Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01316-5
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.