Abstract
17 RCTs for 15 digital health applications (DiGA) permanently listed in the state-regulated register were analyzed descriptively for methodological study aspects relevant to evidence analysis. The analysis revealed that several underlying studies had limitations, at least worthy of discussion, in terms of their power concerning sample size, intervention and control group specifications, drop-out rates, and blinding.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Albrecht, U. V., Von Jan, U., Lawin, D., Pustozerov, E., & Dittrich, F. (2023). Evidence of Digital Health Applications from a State-Regulated Repository for Reimbursable Health Applications in Germany. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 302, pp. 423–427). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230165
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
