Rate of cognitive decline during the premotor phase of essential tremor: A prospective study

46Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the rate of cognitive decline during the premotor phase of essential tremor (ET) in comparison to prevalent ET cases and controls. Methods: In this population-based, prospective study of people aged 65 years and older (Neurological Disorders in Central Spain), a 37-item version of the Mini-Mental State Examination was administered at 2 visits (baseline and follow-up, approximately 3 years later). We compared the rate of cognitive decline in 3 groups: prevalent ET cases (i.e., participants diagnosed with ET at baseline and at follow-up), "premotor" ET cases (i.e., participants diagnosed with incident ET at follow-up, but not at baseline), and controls (i.e., participants not diagnosed with ET at baseline or follow-up). Results: The 2,375 participants included 135 prevalent ET cases, 56 premotor ET cases, and 2,184 controls. During the follow-up period of 3.4 6 0.5 years (mean 6 SD), the 37-item version of the Mini-Mental State Examination declined by 0.7 6 3.3 points (0.2 6 1.0 points/year) in prevalent ET cases, 1.1 6 3.5 points (0.3 6 1.0 points/year) in premotor ET cases, and 0.1 6 3.9 points (0.0 6 1.2 points/year) in controls (p 5 0.014). The difference between premotor ET cases and controls was significant (p 5 0.046), as was the difference between prevalent ET cases and controls (p 5 0.027). Conclusions: In this prospective cohort, cognitive test scores in premotor and prevalent ET cases declined at a faster rate than in elders without this disease. A decline in global cognitive function may occur in a premotor phase of ET. © 2013 American Academy of Neurology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benito-León, J., Louis, E. D., Sánchez-Ferro, Á., & Bermejo-Pareja, F. (2013). Rate of cognitive decline during the premotor phase of essential tremor: A prospective study. Neurology, 81(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318297ef2b

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free