Underdevelopment in contemporary world: Is structuralism still relevant?

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper intends to evaluate if the Latin American structuralist approach is still relevant to understand capital accumulation dynamics of peripheral countries and their insertion in the global value chains. It's a theoretical paper that strives to improve the building blocks of structuralism with the incorporation of elements from different approaches to establish a nexus to understand capital accumulation dynamics in the periphery. Considering the relevance of technological accumulation, its impacts over the productive structure and over the international insertion, we strive to analyze factors that perpetuate income diversion in relation to the center. Under this perspective, we conclude that the particularities of peripheral economies changed their form of manifestation without effectively overcome the dependence relation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Junior, A. P. V. (2017). Underdevelopment in contemporary world: Is structuralism still relevant? Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 37(4), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572017v37n04a06

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free