Fortune and hindsight: Gene patents' muted effect on medical practice

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Physicians have long worried about gene patents' potential to restrict their medical practices. Fortune and hindsight have proven these worries exaggerated both in the UK and elsewhere. Neither current nor future medical practices appear to be impinged by gene patents, although they may be subject to future intellectual property disputes. Sources of data: Qualitative and quantitative (survey) studies of gene patents' effects on medical practice; recent developments in patent law. Areas of agreement: Traditional gene patents do not appear to have restricted medical practice in the UK, although their effect elsewhere has been more nuanced. Areas of controversy: Whether patents will restrict the spread of newer medical technologies is unresolved. Areas timely for developing research: Continuing survey data on practitioners' views concerning patents' role in the distribution of newer technologies would be beneficial.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sherkow, J. S., & Abbott, R. (2018, June 1). Fortune and hindsight: Gene patents’ muted effect on medical practice. British Medical Bulletin. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldy009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free