Pregnancy rates with recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotropin in in vitro fertilization: An observational study

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated the equal efficacy of urinary human chorionic gonadotropin (uhCG) and recombinant hCG (rhCG) products in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, limitations inherent with RCTs necessitate the reinforcement of RCT results in real-life. We retrospectively analyzed pregnancies after treatment with rhCG and uhCG products (n = 391, and 96, resp.). We found that laboratory-verified pregnancy occurred more frequently in rhCG patients than in those on uhCG (43 versus 30, P = 0.02). The association remains significant (P = 0.002) after its adjustment for clinical characteristics. The prevalence of laboratory-verified pregnancies was higher with GnRH agonist use (P = 0.012) and BMI under 30kg/m2 (P = 0.053) while decreased the age (P = 0.014) and the number of previous failed attempts (P = 0.08). Similar (but not significant) trends were observed with rates of pregnancy filled the 24th week. These results reinforce RCTs supporting the notion that rhCG is more efficient as uhCG during IVF. Copyright © 2011 Jzsef Zeke et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeke, J., Kanyó, K., Zeke, H., Cseh, Á., Vásárhelyi, B., Szilágyi, A., & Konc, J. (2011). Pregnancy rates with recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotropin in in vitro fertilization: An observational study. TheScientificWorldJournal, 11, 1781–1787. https://doi.org/10.1100/2011/409140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free