Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another?

44Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rather short history of diagnostic algorithms for investigating patients with a suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has led to a constantly evolving and unquestionably chaotic scenario. Although the recent development and introduction of high-sensitivity immunoassays for the measurement of cardiac troponins has represented a paradigm shift for dispersing part of the overwhelming fog, many uncertainties remain, especially concerning the appropriate timing for serial testing and the interpretation of cardiac troponin variations over time. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the available evidence about diagnostic algorithms for ACS which incorporate the measurement of cardiac troponins, and generate a final algorithm attempting to integrate and harmonize the many clinical and laboratory findings emerged from the recent scientific literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cervellin, G., Mattiuzzi, C., Bovo, C., & Lippi, G. (2016). Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another? Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.05.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free