Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 (SNOT-22) is used widely as a patient-reported sinonasal quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery. However, it has never been validated in this population. This study explores the psychometric validity of SNOT-22 to determine if it is a valid scale in patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary surgery. Study Design: Multicenter prospective trial. Methods: Adult patients (n = 113) with pituitary tumors undergoing endoscopic surgery were enrolled in a multicenter study. Patient-reported QOL was assessed using SNOT-22 and the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12. Face validity, internal consistency, responsiveness to clinical change, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity were determined using standard statistical methods. Results: Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha at baseline and 2 weeks postoperatively were 0.911 and 0.922, indicating SNOT-22 performed well as a single construct. Mean QOL scores were significantly worse at 2 weeks than baseline (16.4 ± 15.1 vs. 23.1 ± 16.4, P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sarris, C. E., Little, A. S., Kshettry, V. R., Rosen, M. R., Rehl, R. M., Haegen, T. W., … Evans, J. J. (2021). Assessment of the Validity of the Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 in Pituitary Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Trial. Laryngoscope, 131(11), E2757–E2763. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29711
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.