Insurance contracts and securitization

22Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

High correlations between risks can increase required insurer capital and/or reduce the availability of insurance. For such insurance lines, securitization is rapidly emerging as an alternative form of risk transfer. The ultimate success of securitization in replacing or complementing traditional insurance and reinsurance products depends on the ability of securitization to facilitate and/or be facilitated by insurance contracts. The authors consider how insured losses might be decomposed into separate components, one of which is a type of "systemic risk" that is highly correlated among insureds. Such a correlated component might conceivably be hedged directly by individuals but is more likely to be hedged by the insurer. The authors examine how insurance contracts may be designed to allow the insured a mechanism to retain all or part of the systemic component. Examples are provided that illustrate this methodology in several types of insurance markets subject to systemic risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doherty, N. A., & Schlesinger, H. (2002). Insurance contracts and securitization. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6975.00004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free