THE IMPACTS AND CAUSES OF THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT ON STUDENTS, TEACHERS, AND ADMINISTRATIONS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING ENVIRONMENTS

  • Smith S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Dunning-Kruger Effect (DKE) is a cognitive bias where individuals with limited ability or knowledge tend to overestimate their own competencies, while those who are more skilled often underestimate their capabilities. Identified in a seminal 1999 study by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, this phenomenon underscores essential concepts in metacognition – the awareness and understanding of one’s thought processes. The DKE manifests across various domains, particularly in educational contexts, leading to significant implications for students, teachers, and administrators within English Language Teaching (ELT). This paper explores the origins and key findings surrounding the DKE, illustrating its detrimental impact on selfassessment and feedback mechanisms. It addresses students’ overconfidence or self-doubt in language proficiency, the challenges teachers face in evaluating their instructional effectiveness, and the potential pitfalls administrators encounter in decision-making and policy implementation. Additionally, the paper discusses the interplay of related biases, such as optimism bias and cognitive dissonance, which further complicate accurate self-evaluation. To combat these challenges, it advocates for enhanced metacognitive training, constructive feedback strategies, and a growth mindset for all stakeholders involved. Ultimately, fostering self-awareness and a reflective practice in ELT settings can lead to improved learning outcomes and a more productive educational environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, S. (2024). THE IMPACTS AND CAUSES OF THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT ON STUDENTS, TEACHERS, AND ADMINISTRATIONS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING ENVIRONMENTS. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science, 07(04), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.54922/ijehss.2024.0772

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free