Different operational alternatives of aquifer thermal energy storage system for cooling and heating of a residential complex under various climatic conditions in Iran

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this research, a confined aquifer with low groundwater flow was considered to meet the cooling and heating requirements of residential complexes. The complexes were located in the cities of Ahvaz, Ardabil, Bandar Abbas, Esfahan, Kerman, Rasht, Tehran, and Zahedan. The complex in Ardabil mostly required heating, the ones in Ahvaz and Bandar Abbas mostly required cooling, and the complexes in other cities required both heating and cooling. Four different alternatives of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) were analyzed in this study. These alternatives consisted of using ATES: 1) alone for cooling, 2) coupled with a conventional refrigeration system or a chiller for cooling, 3) by employing flat plate solar collectors for heating, and 4) by employing flat plate solar collectors and a heat pump for heating. Thermal energy recovery factor and the annual Coefficient Of Performance (COP) of the alternatives were determined. The results showed that for buildings located in cities with mild climatic conditions (such as Esfahan), where the annual heating and cooling energy requirements were almost equal, the use of ATES would be highly recommendable, no matter through what alternative considered in this investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghaebi, H., Bahadori, M. N., & Saidi, M. H. (2019). Different operational alternatives of aquifer thermal energy storage system for cooling and heating of a residential complex under various climatic conditions in Iran. Scientia Iranica, 26(3B), 1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.20323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free