Continuous versus single shot adductor canal block for postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for randomized controlled trial

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background:Adductor canal block has become a popular mode of pain management after total knee arthroplasty. This study compared a single-injection adductor canal block (SACB) with continuous adductor canal block (CACB). The hypothesis was that the 2 groups would have equivalent analgesia at 48 hours post-neural blockade.Methods:This is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, equivalency trial that is conducted at a single university hospital in China. A total of 60 patients who meet inclusion criteria are randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either CACB (0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h for 48 hours) or SACB (0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL) group. The primary outcome is pain scores at 48 hours utilizing the visual analog scale, whereas the secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, Timed Up & Go test, ambulation distances at discharge, length of stay, and maximal flexion at discharge. All pain scores are assessed by an independent observer who is blinded to the allocation of groups.Results:This study has limited inclusion and exclusion criteria and a well-controlled intervention. This clinical trial is expected to provide evidence of better therapy for the pain management after total knee arthroplasty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tao, Y., Mao, Q., & Wang, J. (2020). Continuous versus single shot adductor canal block for postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for randomized controlled trial. Medicine (United States), 99(17), E19918. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free