Perioperative Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Geriatric Hip Fracture: The Importance of Studying Matched Populations

6Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Geriatric femoral neck fracture is a common injury for which hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be considered in select patients. As prior database studies comparing these have not used propensity matching, which is a robust statistical method of controlling for potentially confounding variables, unmatched and matched methodologies are contrasted in the present study. Methods: Patients aged ≥70 years who underwent HA or THA for hip fractures were identified from the 2012-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Propensity score 1:1 matching was performed. Differences in rates of 30-day postoperative adverse outcomes were compared using multivariate logistic regression for unmatched and matched cohorts. Results: In total, 15,558 patients (14,403 HA and 1155 THA) were evaluated. Although multivariate outcomes for the unmatched populations were different for blood transfusion, mortality, minor adverse events, major adverse events, and reoperation, multivariate outcomes for matched populations only differed for blood transfusion (odds ratio 0.6 for HA vs THA, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haynes, M. S., Ondeck, N. T., Ottesen, T. D., Malpani, R., Rubin, L. E., & Grauer, J. N. (2020). Perioperative Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Geriatric Hip Fracture: The Importance of Studying Matched Populations. Journal of Arthroplasty, 35(11), 3188–3194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free