Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination vs latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in open-angle glaucoma patients

36Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) vs latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) given each evening over the 12-h intraocular pressure (IOP) diurnal curve.MethodsA total of 54 eyes of 54 patients (24 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 30 with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG)) were included in this prospective, randomized, evaluator-masked single centre crossover study. Patients with an IOP of ≥19 mmHg, under treatment with prostaglandin analogues, were randomized to BTFC or LTFC for a 12-week treatment period after a 6-week run-in period on timolol maleate 0.5% (one drop in each eye twice each day). Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for the second period. Six 12-h IOP curves were recorded for each patient at baseline (under treatment with timolol maleate 0.5% BID), week 6 and 12 for each treatment period.ResultsThe 12-h IOP (mean (SD)) values were 22.0 (1.0) mmHg at baseline, 17.7 (0.8) mmHg on BTFC, and 18.5 (0.8) mmHg on LTFC (P<0.001). At individual time points, there was a significant difference between groups at 0800, 0100, 1200, 1800, and 2000 hours with BTFC having greater ocular hypotensive effect, P<0.001. The most frequently reported adverse event in the study was conjunctival hyperaemia. Average hyperaemia scores were slightly but significantly lower in the LTFC treatment period (P=0.04).ConclusionThis study suggests that the evening-dosed BTFC provides better IOP control than that of LTFC over 12 h. However, the IOP difference was small and may not be clinically meaningful. © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez, A., & Sanchez, M. (2009). Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination vs latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in open-angle glaucoma patients. Eye, 23(4), 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free