Traffic efficiency evaluation of elliptical roundabout compared with modern and turbo roundabouts considering traffic signal control

30Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper compared the performance of elliptical roundabout with turbo and modern roundabouts. It considers the effects of increasing the central island radius and speed limit on delay and capacity. Three types of roundabouts (modern, turbo and elliptical roundabouts) with different numbers of lanes (single lane, two-lane and three-lane) were designed. Unsignalized and signalized controls were applied for these roundabouts. The robustness of the designed roundabouts was investigated for saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. Based on the obtained results, increasing the central island radius had both positive and negative effects on delay and capacity. However, a positive effect on these variables was observed in all roundabouts when increasing the speed limit. In unsignalized and signalized control under unsaturated flow conditions, a modern roundabout had lower delay time than an elliptical roundabout. Moreover, in saturated flow, the elliptical roundabout had the best performance in terms of delay. Overall, in comparison with the turbo roundabouts, modern and elliptical roundabouts had the highest capacities in unsignalized and signalized controls. This study can provide useful information for engineers who decide to design a roundabout.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hatami, H., & Aghayan, I. (2017). Traffic efficiency evaluation of elliptical roundabout compared with modern and turbo roundabouts considering traffic signal control. Promet - Traffic and Transportation, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v29i1.2053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free