Clinical relevance of bone remodelling around conventional and conservative (short-stem) total hip arthroplasty implants

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Based on data from the existing literature, we can safely suggest that bone mineral changes around cementless and cemented conventional femoral stems, and conservative femoral stems, are not predictive of either satisfactory or unsatisfactory total hip arthroplasty long term clinical outcomes. Additionally, studies with a follow up shorter than 5–10 years are perhaps clinically irrelevant. These observations may be helpful in interpreting the existing literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karachalios, T., Palaiochorlidis, E., & Komnos, G. (2019, January 1). Clinical relevance of bone remodelling around conventional and conservative (short-stem) total hip arthroplasty implants. HIP International. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018810846

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free