Mediationism Has No Place in Psychology: Reply to Salthouse

  • Watkins M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Responds to the comments by T. A. Salthouse (see record 1997-06394-001) on the article by M. J. Watkins (see record 1990-16345-001) regarding mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. Salthouse's commentary is grounded in the premise that the overriding theme of Watkins's article is the proliferation of memory theories, and this may be slightly misleading. The author argues that by focusing on the proliferation of memory theories, Salthouse missed the author's basic argument, that mediationism obfuscates the true nature of memory and has no place in psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2002 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watkins, M. J. (1996). Mediationism Has No Place in Psychology: Reply to Salthouse. The Behavior Analyst, 19(1), 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392748

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free