Network optimization for optimal product mix decisions in a graphite mining production process

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a novel general mathematical model to find the optimal product mix of commercial graphite products, which has a complex production process with alternative sub-processes in the graphite mining production process. Design/methodology/approach: The network optimization was adopted to model the complex graphite mining production process through the optimal allocation of raw graphite, byproducts, and saleable products with comparable sub-processes, which has different processing capacities and costs. The model was tested on a selected graphite manufacturing company, and the optimal graphite product mix was determined through the selection of the optimal production process. In addition, sensitivity and scenario analyses were carried out to accommodate uncertainties and to facilitate further managerial decisions. Findings: The selected graphite mining company mines approximately 400 metric tons of raw graphite per month to produce ten types of graphite products. According to the optimum solution obtained, the company should produce only six graphite products to maximize its total profit. In addition, the study demonstrated how to reveal optimum managerial decisions based on optimum solutions. Originality/value: This study has made a significant contribution to the graphite manufacturing industry by modeling the complex graphite mining production process with a network optimization technique that has yet to be addressed at this level of detail. The sensitivity and scenario analyses support for further managerial decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karunamuni, K. S. M., Ekanayake, E. M. K. B., Dharmapriya, S., & Kulatunga, A. K. (2024). Network optimization for optimal product mix decisions in a graphite mining production process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6(3), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIEOM-12-2022-0072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free