Machine Learning in RADAR-Based Physiological Signals Sensing: A Scoping Review of the Models, Datasets, and Metrics

14Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the field of physiological signals monitoring and its applications, non-contact technology is often proposed as a possible alternative to traditional contact devices. The ability to extract information about a patient's health status in an unobtrusive way, without stressing the subject and without the need of qualified personnel, fuels research in this growing field. Among the various methodologies, RADAR-based non-contact technology is gaining great interest. This scoping review aims to summarize the main research lines concerning RADAR-based physiological sensing and machine learning applications reporting recent trends, issues and gaps with the scientific literature, best methodological practices, employed standards to be followed, challenges, and future directions. After a systematic search and screening, two hundred and seven papers were collected following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). The included records covered two macro-areas being regression of physiological signals or physiological features (n=77 papers) and the other a cluster of papers regarding the processing of RADAR-based physiological signals and features; the latter cluster concerns four fields of interest, being RADAR-based diagnosis (n=77), RADAR-based human behaviour monitoring (n=25), RADAR-based biometric authentication (n=19) and RADAR-based affective computing (n=9). Papers collected under the diagnosis category were further divided, on the basis of their aims: in breath pattern classification (n=41), infection detection (n=10), sleep stage classification (n=9), heart disease detection (n=9) and quality detection (n=8). Papers collected under the human behaviour monitoring were further divided based on their aims: fatigue detection (n=9), human detection (n=7), human localisation (n=4), human orientation (n=2), and activities classification (n=3).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nocera, A., Senigagliesi, L., Raimondi, M., Ciattaglia, G., & Gambi, E. (2024). Machine Learning in RADAR-Based Physiological Signals Sensing: A Scoping Review of the Models, Datasets, and Metrics. IEEE Access. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3482690

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free