The Patentability of Second and Subsequent Medical Uses in Asia's Patent Legislation

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines, from a comparative law perspective, how jurisdictions across East, Southeast and South Asia deal with the issue of the patentability of second/subsequent medical uses. The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of subsequent medical uses of known medical compositions, as a number of medicines that are being used to treat Covid-19 were originally developed for other illnesses. The decision whether second/subsequent medical uses of pharmaceuticals are patentable in any given jurisdiction is, however, a policy decision to the extent that it is one of the main exclusions available to countries as a 'flexibility' under the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement). The results of this study show that there is a wide variation in Asia regarding the patentability of second/subsequent uses, and examines the possible reasons for this variation. The paper concludes with recommendations for countries in the region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adachi, K. (2023). The Patentability of Second and Subsequent Medical Uses in Asia’s Patent Legislation. In Asian Journal of Law and Economics (Vol. 14, pp. 59–75). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2022-0091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free