Comparison of Outcomes Between Functionally and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of Parallelism to the Ground and Weight-Bearing Position of the Knee Using Hip-to-Calcaneus Radiographs

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing mechanically aligned conventional total knee arthroplasty (MA-CTKA) and functionally aligned robotic-arm-assisted TKA (FA-RTKA). Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis between June 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups—MA-CTKA (n = 50) and FA-RTKA (n = 50)—based on the introduction of a robotic-arm-assisted system during the study period. The hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, joint line orientation angle (JLOA) relative to the floor, and weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio were evaluated using full-length standing hip-to-calcaneus radiographs to compare the conventional mechanical axis (MA) and the ground mechanical axis (GA) passing through the knee joint between the groups. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the postoperative HKA angle between the groups, due to discrepancies in the targeted alignment strategies (FA-RTKA: 2.0° vs. MA-CTKA: 0.5°; p = 0.001). The postoperative JLOA in the FA-RTKA group was more parallel to the floor, whereas the MA-CTKA group showed a downward angulation toward the lateral side (0.6° vs. −2.7°; p < 0.001). In the FA-RTKA group, the GA passed through a neutral position when accounting for the calcaneus, while the MA-CTKA group showed a more lateral GA position (48.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.001). No significant differences in clinical outcomes were shown between the FA-RTKA and MA-CTKA groups, with the FA-RTKA group demonstrating higher Forgotten Joint Scores and a greater range of motion (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Functionally aligned TKA demonstrated improved joint line parallelism to the floor and more neutral weight-bearing alignment in the GA compared to mechanically aligned TKA. These findings indicate a more balanced load distribution across the knee, which may contribute to the superior clinical outcomes observed in the functionally aligned group.